Pretty much every Bond movie has at least something to recommend it, either a cool bit of business, a nice action scene, a good line or character, etc. But for me, these five are the dregs of the series. In ascending order, then, here are my least favorite Bond films: 5) Diamonds Are Forever It's great to have Connery back in his signature role, and he's easily the best thing about this very episodic and rather unglamorous Bond film. While there are some nice moments (Bond's fight with Franks in the elevator, for instance), overall this is a shaggy dog Bond, and once again, a mostly US-based setting detracts from the exotic nature that characterizes a proper Bond film in my eyes. The not-so-ambiguously gay duo Wynt and Kidd are OK henchmen at best, Jill St. John looks scrumptious but comes off as a complete bimbo and it seems clear that the budget's run out for the final “big” action setpiece, which is limp and cringe-inducing in equal measure. 4) Licence to Kill First off, let me say one thing: taken strictly as an action film, Licence To Kill is just fine, with some really spectacular stunts, a decent plot and good acting. It's just not a Bond film. Instead, we get what basically amounts to a grandiose episode of Miami Vice, with a pedestrian drug dealer main baddie and very little in the way of glamor or style. Timothy Dalton is a fine actor but seems pinched and uncomfortable as 007, trying to imbue the proceedings with a Shakespearean seriousness that just doesn't jibe well with the movie incarnation of the character. 3) Die Another Day An argument can be made for the inclusion of Tomorrow Never Dies in this bottom list, with its rather pedestrian script and villain, but Die Another Day is by far the more egregious offender. In a way, it's a shame, as DAD starts out really fun, with a formula-breaking opening with Bond imprisoned and tortured by the North Koreans, his eventual release and priceless entrance into a swank Hong Kong hotel looking like a homeless wastrel, then a colorful little expedition to Cuba and his triumphant return to Britain. You can clearly mark the precise moment when the film goes off the rails: right after the terrific sword fight between Bond and Toby Stephens (the less said about the frightful Madonna appearance, the better, though). Everything goes spectacularly downhill from there, what with the ridiculous ice palace, the invisible car and the sight of Bond parasailing away chased by laser beams. Just stupid, stupid, stupid. DAD hits much higher highs than Tomorrow Never Dies, but nothing in the latter film is nearly as bad as the last half of this one. 2) Quantum of Solace Awesome poster, bad movie. After the triumph of the reboot that was Casino Royale, Daniel Craig's second outing as 007 falls flat on its face. For the first time, the series tries a direct sequel, as an avenging Bond is on the warpath for those responsible for Vesper Lynd's predicament and eventual death. It's a good idea in theory, but the execution is botched, with perhaps the limpest excuse for a Bond villain in the series long history. But what really does the film in is Marc Forster's inexperience with directing action. He apparently turned all of the action scenes over to the 2nd unit, who obviously did a stellar job, but their work is ruined by ridiculously choppy editing. This kind of editing worked well in the Bourne films, but it's all wrong for Bond. Quantum of Solace ends up a real drab disappointment. Craig is still aces, though. 1) A View to a Kill It's easy to pick on Roger Moore's final outing as 007. The actor looks damn good for his age by regular people standards, but at 58 is just to old to be convincing in the part. It doesn't help that he's stuck with the most vapid of Bond girls in the gorgeous but vacuous Tanya Roberts. Add yet another predominantly U.S.-set adventure, uninteresting villains (an OTT Christopher Walken and an alarmingly masculine Grace Jones) and a general air of tiredness to go along with its aging star, and A View to a Kill adds up to an anemic outing. We also see the nadir of the Moore-era goofy comic touches, with the shuddersome moment right in the middle of an otherwise well-mounted pre-credits snow-boarding sequence, when the Beach Boys “California Girls” kicks in. Embarrassing. That said, there are still a few good points: Patrick Macnee makes for a charming companion for Moore's Bond, there's a nice car chase in Paris and a cool parachute stunt off the Eiffel Tower. Also, Duran Duran's theme song is one of the best. What do you folks consider the least of the Bonds? Let me know in the comments. 10/3/2012 06:20:18 am
No serious disagreement from me with regards to your arguments with the exception of QUANTUM (and I know I'm in a minority),
Jeff
10/4/2012 07:15:58 pm
Thanks for the thoughtful comments as always, Sergio! I respect your right to like QUANTUM even if I think you're dead wrong. ;) On a serious note, I think there's a good Bond film in there somewhere, trying desperately to come out, but the direction and editing are unfortunately botched. Craig comes out with his dignity intact, anyway.
Can't really argue with any of those Jeff. I will maintain to my dying day that Quantum of Solace is the most odious piece of cack-handed pretension ever to masquerade as a Bond movie - a truly soul destroying experience.
Jeff
10/4/2012 07:22:18 pm
Cheers for the pithy comments, Colin! As usual, we are on the same page here (other than your indecipherable failure to grasp the excellence of THUNDERBALL, that is ;)
Hi Jeff, well you already know I'd disagree with you on Licence To Kill which is one of my fave Bond films (naturally, given my feelings for Dalton). But I see what you mean that "It's just not a Bond film" as at times I feel that it's a bit out of character for Bond in that film and I think the filmmakers were aware that it may not please Bond fans.
Jeff
10/8/2012 07:52:48 am
Hi Ruth!
Robert Leung
3/14/2014 09:06:29 am
Hey Jeff
Robert Leung
4/18/2014 11:23:05 pm
Hey Jeff
Jeff
4/19/2014 06:43:06 pm
Very sorry for the late response, Robert! Thanks for visiting and checking out some of my posts on Bond. As you know from reading around my site, I'm a big fan of ON HER MAJESTY'S SECRET SERVICE, so I'd take your "first four Bonds" and change it to the first six. I also have a fondness for Moore's entries, especially FOR YOUR EYES ONLY, but can understand where you're coming from...they're a long way from the early Connerys.
Graziano
5/25/2015 12:01:02 am
Da "Dr.No" a "On her Majesty's secret service" fu tutto azzeccato. Dopo Sean Connery, anche George Lazenby era molto credibile nei panni di 007; anzi forse George, se avesse continuato, avrebbe potuto essere anche meglio di Sean Connery. Tutti gli attori venuti dopo Lazenby non c'entrano nulla con James Bond: Roger Moore non è credibile; nelle scene di lotta fa tenerezza, quelle scene sanno di finto, sono ridicole. Timothy Dalton è un altro che non c'entra niente con la parte, ci mette buona volontà perchè è un ottimo professionista, ma è stata una pessima scelta nel ruolo. Anche Pierce Brosnan ha un fisico che fa tenerezza, non ha la minima autorevolezza. Sarà anche un bravo attore, ma che c'entra con 007? Infine, Daniel Craig: sembra più un killer russo, un ipotetico nemico villain in un film di Bond, che Bond. Starebbe bene in un ruolo tipo il Red Grant di "From Russia with love". Insomma, dopo OHMSS non ne hanno azzeccato più uno nella parte del protagonista; anche lo Sean Connery di "Diamands are forever" fa pena, sembra ormai il padre di quello che c'era nel film precedente, ossia George Lazenby. George, perchè ti sei fatto condizionare da quel coglione invidioso che ti faceva da agente? E' un vero peccato che le cose siano andate in quel modo: avresti fatto dei film meravigliosi di 007 e saresti diventato un grande attore.
Jeff
5/25/2015 09:39:27 pm
Thank you, Graziano! In general, I agree with many of your points, from what I could follow of them. I'll run down my best understanding of your points above (please correct me if I've misunderstood you):
Graziano
5/26/2015 09:05:17 am
Mi hai capito abbastanza bene, Jeff. Roger Moore mi è simpatico e sembra anche un'ottima persona, ma James Bond in film come "The spy who loved me", "Moonraker", "Octopussy", "A view to a kill", non ha più nulla dell'agente segreto inventato da Ian Fleming. E' un peccato mortale che di libri belli come "La spia che mi amava" e "Moonraker" nella versione cinematografica sia rimasto solo il titolo. Ci si poteva fare due film eccezionali con quelle due trame dei libri. Infatti i primi sei film di 007 sono i migliori, perchè sono i più simili ai libri di Ian Fleming, eccetto "You only live twice", che però mi è piaciuto. In realtà "Si vive solo due volte", nei libri di Fleming, è il seguito di "Al servizio segreto di sua Maestà", e non lo precede come nella serie cinematografica. E' il capitolo nel quale Bond incontra di nuovo Blofeld, dopo che quest'ultimo gli aveva fatto ammazzare la moglie Tracy. Purtroppo da Roger Moore in poi Fleming è stato sempre più abbandonato; non si possono far scrivere i film di 007 ad uno come Tom Mankiewicz, infatti il risultato negativo si è visto in "Diamands are forever", anche questo film disastroso è tratto da un affascinante libro di Fleming, di cui non si è messo quasi nulla. Il problema è che la gente del cinema non ha la cultura e la fantasia di chi crea cose geniali come Fleming. Non è un caso che di gente come Stanley Kubrick ce ne sia stata poca, lui era un regista che riusciva a valorizzare, ma anche a migliorare, una storia tratta da un libro, "Arancia meccanica", tanto per citarne uno.
Jeff
5/26/2015 04:18:56 pm
Thank you, Graziano, for your further thoughts. I agree that in most cases, the 007 films which follow the books the closest are generally the best. I do think THE SPY WHO LOVED ME as written would not be workable as a proper Bond film, and I also in my opinion MOONRAKER, silly as that film can be, has a much better and more interesting plot than the more prosaic novel does. (I also concede your point that Roger Moore - by all accounts a real sweetheart of a guy in real life - is probably too nice to be a proper Bond...he had a hard time bringing that cruel, predatory edge to the character that comes so easily to the likes of Connery, Craig and Lazenby).
Graziano
5/27/2015 02:23:01 am
Hai detto una cosa esatta, Jeff: "The spy who loved me", il libro, non ha proprio il format tipico di un film bondiano, ma piuttosto di un prodotto televisivo su 007. Tuttavia un ottimo sceneggiatore cinematografico riuscirebbe, con le opportune aggiunte a renderlo altrettanto interessante, senza dovere necessariamente ambientare tutto il film in un grande albergo chiuso. Gli spunti ci sono per avere altre idee su quella storia. Tra l'altro, Fleming nel libro, quando Bond compare, scrive che sta tornando dall'operazione Tuono, ossia dalla missione del libro precedente (Thunderball); per cui ciò può far pensare, ad un ipotetico sceneggiatore, di inserire ad esempio una prima parte piuttosto movimentata nella trasposizione cinematografica, per poi sfociare gradualmente negli eventi del libro, che comunque possono essere ulteriormente migliorati. Ciò che accade nel libro è un thriller vero e proprio, volendo ci si può aggiungere anche qualcosa di spionistico, ma io ci lascerei gli stessi personaggi, magari ne aggiungerei altri. Ci sono tanti modi per poter far vivere nel cinema quella storia. Comments are closed.
|
Videophilia!
Opinionated ramblings about new and old movies (mostly old, as that's the way I like 'em!) Blogs of Note
Stuart Galbraith IV's World Cinema Paradise
Movie Morlocks (TCM's Classic Movie Blog) 50 Westerns from the 50s Riding the High Country Sweet Freedom Tipping My Fedora Thrilling Days of Yesteryear Silver Screenings Laura's Miscellaneous Musings Classic TV and Film Cafe Just a Cineast She Blogged By Night Chess, Comics, Crosswords, Books, Music, Cinema Out of the Past - A Classic Film Blog Pretty Sinister Books They Don't Make 'Em Like They Used To In So Many Words... Greenbriar Picture Shows Flix Chatter My Love of Old Hollywood Tales of the Easily Distracted Another Old Movie Blog Lasso the Movies Kevin's Movie Corner Films From Beyond the Time Barrier Carole & Co. Rupert Pupkin Speaks Caftan Woman Vienna's Classic Hollywood The Lady Eve's Reel Life ClassicBecky's Brain Food Hey!
Be sure to subscribe to the RSS feed below, to be informed of new postings! Categories
All
Archives
September 2015
|